ࡱ>  s{bjbj .eep HH8"tL'H****49tB'D'D'D'D'D'D'$)W,rh'h'**}'!!!**B'!B'!!:&,&*'UK & .''0'& ,!,&,&<!h'h'!',H h: Appendix 2 Extract from DfE Operational Guidance Local authority funding formulae factors for 2018 to 2019 Weve made one addition to the list of allowable funding factors in local funding formulae in 2018 to 2019. Local authorities can set a minimum per-pupil amount for schools, details of this are set out in paragraph 47 - 51. The local factor values and parameters may continue to differ from those used in the NFF, since authorities retain local discretion in 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020. The NFF unit values are set out in figure 3  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-funding-formula-for-schools-and-high-needs" NFF for Schools and High Needs The full list of allowable factors in 2018 to 2019 are: Funding factorDescription and further information1. Basic entitlement A compulsory factorThis factor assigns funding on the basis of individual pupils, with the number of pupils for each school or academy based on the October pupil census. funding is allocated according to an age-weighted pupil unit (AWPU) there is a single rate for primary age pupils, which must be at least 2,000 there can be different rates for KS3 and KS4, with a minimum of 3,000 for each local authorities can choose to increase the pupil number count for schools with higher reception pupil numbers in January 2017 than the October 2016 census well not include reception uplift in the national funding formula; local authorities currently using a reception uplift factor should consider whether to do so in 2018 to 2019 schools with reception uplift will not be financially disadvantaged in the national funding formula calculations, as the funding will remain in their baselines2. Deprivation A compulsory factorLocal authorities can use free school meals (FSM), the income deprivation affecting children index (IDACI), or both to calculate the deprivation factor. we measure eligibility for current FSM using the previous October census, and Ever6 FSM (pupils entitled to free meals at any time in the last 6 years) from the previous January census local authorities using FSM to calculate deprivation can choose to use either current FSM, Ever6 FSM, or both the IDACI measure uses 6 bands, and different values can be attached to each band; different unit values can be used for primary and secondary within each band well automatically set the FSM Ever6 ratio equal to the current FSM ratio for schools where the FSM Ever6 rate is recorded as lower than the current FSM rate3. Prior attainment An optional factor (used by most local authorities)The prior attainment factor acts as a proxy indicator for low level, high incidence, special educational needs. well confirm a separate weighting for new year 7 pupils later in the year Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Prior_attainment" more information in the prior attainment section of this guidance.4. Looked-after children (LAC) An optional factorLocal authorities can apply a single unit value for any child who has been looked after for one day or more, as recorded on the LA SSDA903 return at 31 March 2017. we map this data to schools using the January school census, to identify the number of LAC in each school or academy weve increased the pupil premium plus rates for 2018 to 2019 from 1900 to 2300 weve not used a LAC factor in the national funding formula; local authorities currently using this factor should consider whether to do so in 2018 to 20195. English as an additional language (EAL) An optional factorPupils identified in the October census with a first language other than English may attract funding for up to three years after they enter the statutory school system. local authorities can choose to use indicators based on one, two, or three years, and there can be separate unit values for primary and secondary6. Pupil mobility An optional factorThis measure counts pupils who entered a school during the last three academic years, but did not start in August or September (or January for reception pupils). there is a 10% threshold, and funding is allocated based on the proportion above the threshold (for example, a school with 12% mobility, will attract pupil mobility funding for 2% of pupils)7. Sparsity An optional factorSchools that are eligible for sparsity funding must meet two criteria: they are located in areas where pupils would have to travel a significant distance to an alternative should the school close they are small schools Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Sparsity" more information in the sparsity section of this guidance.8. Lump sum An optional factor (used by all local authorities)Local authorities can set a flat lump sum for all phases, or differentiate the sums for primary and secondary. local authorities should give middle schools a weighted average, based on the number of year groups in each phase the maximum lump sum is 175,000, even for schools that receive London fringe uplift Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Lump_sum" more information in the lump sum section of this guidance, including information for amalgamated schools.9. Split sites An optional factorThe purpose of this factor is to support schools that have unavoidable extra costs because the school buildings are on separate sites. allocations must be based on objective criteria for the definition of a split site, and for how much is paid Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Split_sites_1" more information in the split sites section of this guidance.10. Rates An optional factor (used by all local authorities)Local authorities must fund rates at their estimate of the actual cost. local authorities can make adjustments to rates during the financial year, but this must be done outside of the funding formula for example, an additional allocation could be made to a school (funded by balances brought forward) this should be reflected in the Section 251 outturn statement, and in each schools accounts the effect on the school would be zero, since any rates adjustment will be offset by a change in the cost of the rates11. Private finance initiative (PFI) contracts An optional factorThe purpose of this factor is to support schools that have unavoidable extra premises costs (because they are a PFI school), and to cover situations where the PFI affordability gap is delegated and paid back to the local authority. Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Private_finance_initiative" more information in the PFI section of this guidance. 12. London fringe An optional factor, applicable only for five local authorities (Buckinghamshire, Essex, Hertfordshire, Kent, and West Sussex)The purpose of this factor is to support schools that have to pay higher teacher salaries because they are in the London fringe area, and only part of the local authority is in this area. This factor is applied as a multiplier of 1.0156 to the 6 pupil-led factors, the lump sum factor, and the sparsity factor Weve provided details of these calculations in the  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authorities" technical specification for the schools block dataset.13. Exceptional premises factors An optional factorLocal authorities can apply to ESFA to use exceptional factors relating to school premises (for example, for rents, or joint-use sports facilities). exceptional factors must relate to premises costs local authorities should only submit applications where the value of the factor is more than 1% of a schools budget, and applies to fewer than 5% of the schools in the authoritys area local authorities can use exceptional premises factors used in 2017 to 2018 (for pre-existing, and newly-qualifying schools) in 2018 to 2019, if the qualification criteria are still met14. Minimum level of per pupil funding for secondary schools An optional factor The purpose of this factor is to allow local authorities to provide amounts up to the minimum per pupil funding levels for primary and secondary schools. The formula will provide local authorities with per-pupil funding of at least 3,500 for primary schools and 4,800 for secondary schools with pupils in years 10 and 11 in 2019 to 2020 The formula will provide a transitional minimum amount of per pupil funding of at least 3,300 for primary schools and 4,600 for secondary schools in 2018 to 2019, as a step towards the 3,500 and 4,800 in 2019 to 2020. Where local authorities choose to use this factor, any capping and scaling cannot take the school below the minimum value set in the local formula Local authorities should calculate the minimum per pupil level on the basis of the schools total funding. This will be set out in the APT guidance. Local authorities who wish to reflect the NFF calculation by excluding premises factors that have been excluded from the NFF calculation should submit a disapplication request to agree this change. Weve included  HYPERLINK "#_Setting_a_minimum" more information on the setting a minimum per pupil amount for schools section of this guidance.Table 1: Schools funding factors Required proportion of funding allocated through pupil-led factors Local authorities must allocate at least 80% of the delegated schools block funding through pupil-led factors (the factors in lines 1 to 6 and 14 above, and London fringe uplift, where relevant). The Department for Education will provide updated schools block datasets in December 2017. Local authorities should use these datasets when setting their local funding formulae; this will ensure maintained schools, and academies, are funded on the same basis. Weve provided a  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authoritieshttps:/www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authorities" technical specification for the 2018 to 2019 schools block datasets alongside this guidance. Prior attainment Local authorities can apply this factor for: primary pupils identified as not achieving the expected level of development in the early years foundation stage profile (EYFSP) secondary pupils not reaching the expected standard in KS2 at either English or maths The EYFSP changed in 2013, so local authorities can use a weighting to ensure funding delivered through the primary prior attainment factor is not disproportionately affected by the year groups assessed under the new framework (years 1 to 5). Local authorities can continue to choose between two EYFSP scores, for pupils assessed using the old profile (year 6 only); targeting funding to either: all pupils who achieved fewer than 78 points all pupils who achieved fewer than 73 points on the EYFSP We introduced a new national weighting to the secondary low prior attainment factor in 2017 to 2018, to ensure that the new year 7 cohort (the first pupils to sit the new, more challenging, KS2 tests at the end of academic year 2015 to 2016) did not have a disproportionate influence within the total for the prior attainment factor in the mainstream formula. We intend to carry forward this weighting, so it applies to the year 8 cohort in the schools block dataset provided to local authorities for setting their mainstream school funding formula for the financial year 2018 to 2019. We also intend to specify a national weighting for the new year 7 cohort in the 2018 to 2019 schools block dataset, to scale back the proportion of year 7 pupils identified as having low prior attainment to a level commensurate with the number of pupils identified in years 9 to 11 under the previous KS2 tests. Well confirm the new year 7 weighting later in the year. Local authorities will not be able to change the weighting, but will be able to adjust their secondary low prior attainment unit value as in previous years. This will enable local authorities, in most cases, to maintain their low prior attainment factor at previous levels without significant turbulence. Low prior attainment funding will be allocated to all pupils identified as not reaching the expected standard at the previous phase, regardless of their year group. It does not only apply to those pupils in their first year of schooling. As with current funding arrangements, pupils who have not undertaken the assessment are given the overall average attainment score of their year group, so are taken into account when calculating a schools low prior attainment rate. Sparsity Schools that are eligible for sparsity funding must meet two criteria: they are located in areas where pupils would have to travel a significant distance to an alternative should the school close they are small schools For the pupils for whom the school is their closest compatible school, the factor measures the distance (as the crow flies) from their home to their second nearest compatible school and the mean distance for all pupils is then calculated. Since the pupil population changes each year, its possible for a school to be eligible for sparsity funding in one year but not in the next. The school eligibility criteria for sparsity funding is as follows: School phaseMaximum average number of pupils per year groupMinimum average distance to second nearest compatible schoolPrimary21.32 milesSecondary1193 milesMiddle69.12 milesAll-through62.42 milesTable 2: Eligibility criteria for schools to attract sparsity funding Pupil numbers include reception to years 11 only, that is, excluding nursery and sixth form pupils. The maximum value for the sparsity factor is 100,000 (including the London fringe uplift), which can be applied as a taper or as a lump sum. If a taper methodology is used, a school will attract sparsity funding in inverse proportion to its average year group size. Different values and methodologies can be used for the primary, middle, all-through, and secondary phases. Examples are provided below showing whether a school would receive sparsity funding and how much funding it would receive. These examples assume that the year group size and distance thresholds are as set out by ESFA, although local authorities can reduce the pupil numbers and increase the distance criteria if they wish: School A is an infant school with 120 pupils, spread across 3 year groups; the average number of pupils per year group size is therefore 40 (120 / 3). The average distance to the second nearest compatible school is 2.5 miles. School A is not eligible for sparsity funding, as the average number of pupils per year group is too high. School phaseAverage number of pupils per year groupAverage distance to second nearest compatible schoolEligible for sparsity funding?Primary402.5 milesNoTable 3: Example of a school not eligible for sparsity funding School B is a primary school with 120 pupils, spread across 7 year groups; the average number of pupils per year group is therefore 17.14 (120 / 7). The average distance to the second nearest compatible school is 2.2 miles. School B is eligible for sparsity funding, as the average number of pupils per year group is fewer than the maximum, and the average distance is greater than the minimum. If the sparsity value is 100,000, applied on a taper methodology, the school will receive 20,000 (((21.4 17.14) / 21.4) x 100,000) (allowing for rounding) School phaseAverage number of pupils per year groupAverage distance to second nearest compatible schoolEligible for sparsity funding?Primary17.142.2 milesYesTable 4: Example of a school eligible for sparsity funding The sparsity distance for each school has been calculated as a crow flies distance. Local authorities are able to make exceptional applications for schools not meeting the distance criterion where they would have significantly higher mileage if road distances had been used. Local authorities can also make an application to ESFA to include an exceptional factor of up to 50,000 for very small sparse secondary schools, which would otherwise be unable to attract sufficient funding to remain viable. Local authorities can only apply for an exceptional factor where schools have: pupils in years 10 and 11 350 pupils or fewer a sparsity distance of 5 miles or more Where approval was given in 2017 to 2018 to use an exceptional factor for very small sparse secondary schools, or to the road distance for individual schools, that approval can carry forward to 2018 to 2019, if the latest pupil data has not changed significantly. ESFA will produce sparsity distances for all schools in the schools block dataset, and make them available to each local authority. If a school opens after the sparsity distances have been calculated, the local authority can make an exceptional application for the school. The process is the same for schools that are affected by neighbouring schools closing. Well not recalculate the figures during the year in these situations, as it should be possible for an estimate to be made for individual schools. An existing school, qualifying for sparsity funding, would not lose the funding in-year if a new school opened nearby. Local authorities should agree exceptional applications with their schools forum, before submitting to ESFA for consideration. Lump sum The lump sum may be different for primary and secondary schools and the maximum permitted value for either phase continues to be 175,000 (including the London fringe uplift) in local formulae. All-through schools will receive the secondary lump sum value and middle schools will receive an average lump sum value based on the number of primary and secondary year groups in the school. This worked example shows how the lump sum amount for a middle school is calculated. In this example, the primary lump sum is set at 100,000, and the secondary lump sum is set at 120,000. This middle school has a total of 5 year groups; 3 year groups (years 4 to 6) attracting the primary rate, and 2 year groups (years 7 to 8) attracting the secondary rate: School phase rateLump sum amount3 year groups at primary rate ((3/5) x 100,000)60,0002 year groups at secondary rate ((2/5) x 120,000)48,000Total rate for all 5 year groups108,000Table 5: Example of a middle schools lump sum calculation Where schools have amalgamated during the financial year 2017 to 2018, or on 1 April 2018, they will retain the equivalent of 85% of the predecessor schools lump sums for the financial year 2018 to 2019. For example, assuming a lump sum of 100,000, the additional payment would be 70,000 ((100,000 x 2) x 85% - 100,000). Local authorities can apply to ESFA to reduce this in exceptional circumstances. Where schools amalgamate after 1 April 2018, the new school will receive funding equivalent to the formula funding of the closing schools added together for the appropriate proportion of the year. This means that they receive the combined lump sum for the remainder of the year and 85% in the following year, as outlined above. Local authorities may apply to ESFA to provide a second year of protection. Applications must specify the level of protection sought, although in general we would not expect the additional protection to exceed 70% of the combined lump sums. Well consider applications on a case-by-case basis. Split sites A local authority formula can include a factor to provide additional funding to schools that operate on more than one site. Criteria for providing extra funding should be clear and transparent, incorporating clear and objective trigger points, and a clear formula for allocating additional funding. All schools and academies that meet the criteria will be eligible for split site funding. Schools sharing facilities, federated schools and schools with remote sixth forms or remote early years provision are not eligible for split site funding. Examples of clear trigger points are: the sites are a minimum distance apart, as the crow flies, and the sites are separated by a public highway the provision on the additional site does not qualify for an individual school budget share through the DSG the school has remote playing fields, separated from the school by a minimum distance, and there is no safe walking route for the pupils a percentage of staff are required to teach on both sites on a daily basis, to support the principle of a whole school policy, and to maintain the integrity of the delivery of the national curriculum a minimum percentage of pupils are taught on each site on a daily basis Examples of a clear formula for funding schools with split sites are: a lump sum payment a per-pupil rate a rate per square metre of the additional site Values for primary and secondary schools may be different. There may be one rate of payment for the first additional site, and a separate rate for each additional site. Payment rates may be stepped, for example as the distance between sites increases. Private finance initiative (PFI) Methodologies for funding PFI schools must be objective and clear, and capable of being replicated for academies. The purpose of the factor is to fund the additional costs to a school of being in a PFI contract, not necessarily the full cost as some costs may be covered within other factors. An acceptable methodology would generally contain some of the features set out below. These examples are intended to help local authorities formulate a clear process for funding; its unlikely that a local authority would need to incorporate all of the features into its own policy. If a PFI factor is used, all PFI schools should receive it; there may be different arrangements between contracts, but within a contract, all PFI schools should receive funding on an equivalent basis. This does not necessarily mean all schools should receive the same amount per pupil, but they should be treated on a consistent basis. Examples of a clear formula for funding PFI schools are: allocations are in accordance with an original governors agreement allocations reflect the difference between the PFI contractual cost and the grant received by the local authority, less any local authority contribution Methodologies for calculating allocations could include: a percentage of the schools budget share a per-pupil rate a rate per square metre of floor area a historical lump sum previously agreed, and indexed by a percentage per year Agreements can refer to proportions or elements of the schools budget share, which, due to changes in funding arrangements, may have changed significantly. Where this situation occurs, we would expect schools and local authorities to work together to agree an alternative arrangement, so that neither party is significantly disadvantaged. Other funding allocations In addition to the mainstream schools budget share (or general annual grant for academies), schools and academies may receive other types of funding. The most common sources include:  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-national-funding-formula-allocations-and-guidance" early years funding  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-needs-funding-arrangements-2018-to-2019" high needs funding  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/16-to-19-education-funding-guidance" post-16 funding  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and-alternative-provision-settings" pupil premium  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pe-and-sport-premium-for-primary-schools" PE and sport premium  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/universal-infant-free-school-meals-uifsm-funding-allocations-2017-to-2018" universal infant free school meals  HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/strategic-school-improvement-fund" school improvement funding Requesting exceptional premises factors Local authorities can request the inclusion of additional factors in their formula for exceptional circumstances. ESFA may approve additional factors in cases where the nature of the school premises gives rise to significant additional costs greater than 1% of the schools total budget, and where such costs affect fewer than 5% of the schools (including academies) in the authority. Where local authorities have already received approval for exceptional premises factors in the previous five years, they can continue to use the approved factors, if the criteria are still being met. Where an exceptional factor has already been approved for particular schools, its permissible for a further school or schools to receive the factor where a change in circumstances meets the existing approved criteria, providing that the cost to the additional school exceeds 1% of its budget share (as calculated through the APT), and that the factor still applies to fewer than 5% of schools in the authority. Local authorities should apply to ESFA for any new exceptional premises factors in 2018 to 2019, setting out the rationale for the factor, and demonstrating that the criteria are met. Local authorities must submit any applications for exceptional factors before the end of November 2017. Exceptional factors previously approved include: rents joint use of leisure facilities by contractual agreement building schools for the future (BSF) schemes (additional contribution to lifecycle maintenance costs) hire of PE facilities listed buildings school with a farm included as part of its educational provision Each application is considered on its own merits and it should not be assumed that a future application would be successful simply because it falls into one of the categories shown above. Local authorities are not obliged to request additional factors, but in considering whether to do so, they should look at the circumstances of academies and free schools as well as maintained schools. Local authorities can apply for an exceptional factor by attaching the HYPERLINK "https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pre-16-schools-funding-guidance-for-2018-to-2019"  disapplication proforma to the  HYPERLINK "https://form.education.gov.uk/fillform.php?self=1&form_id=HR41uA2F8Dh&type=form&ShowMsg=1&form_name=Knowledge+centre+enquiry+form&noRegister=false&ret=%2Fmodule%2Fservices&noLoginPrompt=1" ESFA contact form. The minimum per pupil amount for schools The national funding formula will provide local authorities with per-pupil funding of at least 3,500 for each primary school and 4,800 for each secondary school (schools with an age range including years 10 and 11) in 2019 to 2020, based on the schools total core funding. It will provide for a transitional amount of 3,300 for primary schools and 4,600 for secondary schools in 2018 to 2019. All-through and middle schools will attract minimum per-pupil funding determined by their individual age ranges. Local authorities can choose to include a new minimum per pupil factor in their formula to allow them to implement this policy locally. The per pupil minimum funding levels are set out below. Local authorities funding allocations will reflect the 2018 to 2019 transitional minimum amounts set out in the table below, but LAs may choose to set an amount up to the 2019 to 2020 amount if they choose to do so. Transitional minimum per pupil funding 2018 to 2019 Minimum per pupil funding 2019 to 2020Primary 3,3003,500Middle schools Weighted average of 3,300 for primary year groups and 4,000 for KS3 year groupsWeighted average of 3,500 for primary year groups and 4,200 for KS3 year groupsSecondary schools 4,6004,800All-through schoolsWeighted average of 3,300 for full primary phase and 4,600 for full secondary phase, assuming all all-through schools have a full primary and secondary phase. If LAs use the rates above this will be 3,842 for all all-through schoolsWeighted average of 3,500 for full primary phase and 4,800 for full secondary phase, assuming all all-through schools have a full primary and secondary phase. If LAs use the rates above this will be 4,042 for all all-through schools Local authority allocations have been published alongside this guidance. The technical detail of the calculations used in the national funding formula to provide the minimum levels of per-pupil funding in 2018 to 2019 and 2019 to 2020 are set out in the technical specifications document. Local authorities should calculate the minimum per pupil level on the basis of the schools total funding. Once capping and scaling have been applied this shouldnt take the schools budget lower than the minimum per pupil level if the authority is using this factor (see paragraphs 70 72). This will be set out in the APT guidance. Local authorities who wish to reflect the NFF calculation by excluding one or more of the premises factors that have been excluded from the NFF calculation should submit a disapplication request to agree this change.  A school is compatible if the pupil is within its age range and the school accepts pupils of this pupils gender. Selective schools and those in Wales and Scotland are discounted when identifying the second nearest school.  The definition of an amalgamated school includes one that has extended its age range as a direct consequence of another closing (for example, an infant school closes and the junior school extends to become a primary school).  Schools total core funding excludes funding for premises, mobility and growth.  Secondary schools that are new and growing will receive the secondary school minimum amounts, even if they do not yet have pupils in year 10 and 11.      23m ! ̯{]{]B#{=jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJnH phtH 4hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJnH phtH :jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH 4hh5B* CJ OJPJQJaJ nH phOutH 8hh5B* CJ$OJPJQJ^JaJnH phOutH 2hzb5B* CJ$OJPJQJ^JaJnH phOutH 2h=5B* CJ$OJPJQJ^JaJnH phOutH  3mN  $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9Dgd$d*$8$9D@&gd$d*$8$9D@&gd   0 D +D̵̵̵̂̂eJ4hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJnH phtH 8hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJnH phtH :jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph ,hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH 4hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH   0 D  l Y uuuZZZZZZd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdlkd$$If 40> G#P  624  apytSX g .hhhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXGhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kdR$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXDEHgef|}ǰǰǰǰ~~~``G0hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph:jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH 9hhB*CJOJPJQJaJmH nH ph sH tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph ,hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH =jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJnH phtH GHgzhhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXihd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX!hd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXf}hhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXhi34pιkkRιkkR0hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph:jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH ,hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 5jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJph,hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph#Yhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kdJ$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXshd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXpqrt~ !!6!O!˲hhO8,hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph:jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph ,hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH -hhB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph 9jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJU^JaJph st~y;hhhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kdz$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX S!99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSXO!P!R!T!f!N#O#######$`&a&&&&&**++϶ρj϶϶϶Lρ:hhB*CJOJPJQJaJfHph q ,hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph:jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH ,hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 5jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJphS!T!f!!"##hd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX##$%$$$%`&hhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kdB$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX`&a&&&&M'((x)*h+hhhhhd $*$8$9DIf^`gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gd^kd$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX +M+e+f+g+i++++,--j.k.еkO11:jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH 7hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\aJnH ph tH 7hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\aJnH phtH 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 5jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJph,hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJph0hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph h+i++++,}hUd $*$8$9DIfgdd x$*$8$9DIfgdd *$8$9Dgd$d xx*$8$9Da$gd^kdr$$If 0> G#P 6292U4  apytSX,,,,-..///0j1w``d *$8$9D^`gd$d*$8$9D@&gd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9DgdSkd $$If 4p$%  %622 l4  ap ytSX k.....15Q68899;;;<ƭ}}\A4hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH AjhhB*CJH*OJPJQJU^JaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 4hh5B* CJ OJPJQJaJ nH phOutH 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH =jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJnH phtH 4hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJnH phtH j111934567888b9y9:;;d *$8$9D^`gd$d*$8$9D@&gd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9Dgd & Fd *$8$9Dgd;;H;x;;;;;T799d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdkd $$If 4F |G#` b `  6    24  apytSX $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd;;;;;;iL99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdukd $$If 4F |G#` b ` 6    24  apytSX $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd;;;;;lLL $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdukd5 $$If 4F |G#` b ` 6    24  apytSX;;< <<lLL $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdukd $$If 4F |G#` b ` 6    24  apytSX<<X<Y<<3>v? @X@@uffffTTT & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9Dgd$d xx*$8$9Da$gdukd $$If 4F |G#` b ` 6    24  apytSX <X<v?@LAfAACYDwDDDFLGEKNK9N[NNNN8OVOʵʂʂʵiPʚ0hh5B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJph 0hh5B* CJ OJPJQJ^JaJ phOu/hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\aJph4hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH 7hh5B*CJOJPJQJ\aJnH phtH @@@-ALAMA6kdQ $$If 4\sG#H H I I  (624  ap(ytSX $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gdMAUAXAbAeAfA4kdC$$If 4\sG#H H I I 624  ap(ytSX $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdfAAA;BB1CCCD:DYD $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9Dgd$d xx*$8$9Da$gd YDZDbDV999d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdkd$$If 4\sG#H H I I  (624  ap(ytSXbDhDrDvDwDDQ=$d xx*$8$9Da$gdkd$$If 4\sG#H H I I 624  ap(ytSX $99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9a$gdDDEFG%GLGTHHeIIOJJEKNKLM9N$d*$8$9D@&gd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9D^`gdd *$8$9Dgd9NKN[N\NNNwjkd$$If 40<$u %6294  apytSX99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdNNNNN*[kd$$If 40<$u%6294  apytSX99d<<$*$8$9DIf]9^9gdd]$$If 40<$u%6294  apytSXNNNN8OPPR*B*CJOJPJQJUaJnH phtH 4hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJnH phtH )ldddpefGghij4j:jsjjjkBkklkn & Fd *$8$9Dgd & Fd *$8$9Dgdd *$8$9Dgd$d*$8$9D@&gdd *$8$9D^`gd4jBk mmimjm}mmmmmVnWnhninknnoѳѳ{\ѳѳ{\A4hh5B* CJ OJPJQJaJ nH phOutH =jhh>*B*CJOJPJQJUaJnH phtH 4hh>*B*CJOJPJQJaJnH phtH 8hh>*B*CJOJPJQJ^JaJnH phtH :jhhB*CJOJPJQJUaJnH ph tH 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH )hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph knnpq.r/rerrrrQxkd$$If 4F H$Z Z Z %6    22 l4  apytSXd $*$8$9DIfgdd *$8$9Dgd$d*$8$9D@&gd oooopSqTq.rrrs sZss}t~tiuvxҳ{`EEEE0)hhB*CJOJPJQJaJph 5hhB*CJOJPJQJ^JaJnH ph tH 4hh5B*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH =jhhB*CJH*OJPJQJUaJnH ph tH 1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH =jhhB* CJH*OJPJQJUaJnH phI}tH 1hhB* CJOJPJQJaJnH phI}tH (hhCJOJPJQJaJnH tH rrrrrrr s[suvkd$$If F H$Z Z Z %6    22 l4  apytSXd $*$8$9DIfgd[s\sosvs}suuud $*$8$9DIfgdvkd>$$If F H$Z Z Z %6    22 l4  apytSX}s~ss3t~tujuuuuuud $*$8$9DIfgdvkd$$If F H$Z Z Z %6    22 l4  apytSXjukuluvxxy{z|zzd{e{yyywrbrrrw & Fr^`rgdgdd *$8$9Dgdvkdf$$If F H$Z Z Z %6    22 l4  apytSX xxxxyyyzz|z}zzzd{e{f{h{i{k{l{n{o{r{s{jh Uh hCJaJjh0JUh1hhB*CJOJPJQJaJnH ph tH e{g{h{j{k{m{n{p{q{r{s{ dgd ,1h. A!"#$% $$If!vh#vC #v :V  4 6,5P 5/ 244  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#vC #v :V  65P 5/ 292U44  pytSX$$If!vh#v%:V  4p  %65%/ 22 l44  p ytSX$$If!vh#v #v #v :V  4 6,5` 5b 5` / 244  pytSX$$If!vh#v #v #v :V  46,5` 5b 5` / 244  pytSX$$If!vh#v #v #v :V  46,5` 5b 5` / 244  pytSX$$If!vh#v #v #v :V  46,5` 5b 5` / 244  pytSX$$If!vh#v #v #v :V  46,5` 5b 5` / 244  pytSX$$If!vh#v#v#v#v:V  4 (6,5H 5I / 244  p(ytSX$$If!vh#v#v#v#v:V  46,5H 5I / 244  p(ytSX$$If!vh#v#v#v#v:V  4 (6,5H 5I / 244  p(ytSX$$If!vh#v#v#v#v:V  46,5H 5I / 244  p(ytSX$$If!vh#vu#v:V  4 %65u5/ 2944  pytSX$$If!vh#vu#v:V  4%65u5/ 2944  pytSX$$If!vh#vu#v:V  4%65u5/ 2944  pytSX$$If!vh#vu#v:V  4%65u5/ 2944  pytSX$$If!vh#vZ :V  4%65Z / 22 l44  pytSX$$If!vh#vZ :V  %65Z / 22 l44  pytSX$$If!vh#vZ :V  %65Z / 22 l44  pytSX$$If!vh#vZ :V  %65Z / 22 l44  pytSX$$If!vh#vZ :V  %65Z / 22 l44  pytSXj 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH J`J Normal dCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRi@R 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k`( 0No List >@> 0 Footnote TextCJaJ@o@ 0Footnote Text ChartH v@v List Paragraph & Fd *$8$9D!B*CJOJPJQJaJph tH D&`!D Footnote ReferenceEHH*zO2z DfESOutNumbered1 & Fd *$8$9D!B*CJOJPJQJaJph tH &OA&LFO3 F(OQ(LFO25 FR@bR g0 Balloon Text dCJOJQJ^JaJRoqR g0Balloon Text CharCJOJQJ^JaJtH PK![Content_Types].xmlN0EH-J@%ǎǢ|ș$زULTB l,3;rØJB+$G]7O٭V$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-![Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 0_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] 1VGgSissss  DpO!+k.<VOa4joxs{>@DILOSV]gjlns GsS!#`&h+,j1;;;;;<@MAfAYDbDD9NNN>%?&???/M4MMMMMeNhNNNOODPEPWPXPhPiP}UUUUVVVVVVVVYY^ZbZZZH[M[G\P\\\i#ipesgshsjsksmsnspsts3333333333333333333333333333333333ptsmsnX`K;h %@4*678:;<>*@EHH*KHS*TX\]^Jwh.0^`06CJ..p0^p`0.. ^ `... x^x` .... h^h` ..... X^X` ...... (^(`....... ^`........^`OJQJ^`OJQJp^p`OJQJ@ ^@ `OJQJ ^`OJQJ^Jo^`OJQJ^`OJQJ ^`OJQJ^JoP^P`OJQJms`K; !ASXt]zb= bgpp@ss@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3. *Cx Arial7.@ Calibri5. .[`)Tahoma;Wingdings?= *Cx Courier NewA$BCambria Math"1hqZqZZG_98,b:!20|p*sKHP  $P2!xx Service BirminghamService BirminghamOh+'0Dx    $,4<Service NormalService 2Microsoft Office Word@F#@lG@&ʨUK@&ʨUK_՜.+,D՜.+,< hp  Service 9|p  Titlep 8@ _PID_HLINKSA(l6x3https://form.education.gov.uk/fillform.php?self=1&form_id=HR41uA2F8Dh&type=form&ShowMsg=1&form_name=Knowledge+centre+enquiry+form&noRegister=false&ret=%2Fmodule%2Fservices&noLoginPrompt=1K0Mhttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/pre-16-schools-funding-guidance-for-2018-to-2019 ->https://www.gov.uk/guidance/strategic-school-improvement-fund*uhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/universal-infant-free-school-meals-uifsm-funding-allocations-2017-to-2018J'Ehttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/pe-and-sport-premium-for-primary-schoolsP$ehttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and-alternative-provision-settingsbk!@https://www.gov.uk/guidance/16-to-19-education-funding-guidancev%Xhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-needs-funding-arrangements-2018-to-2019Uihttps://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-national-funding-formula-allocations-and-guidance Qhttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authoritieshttps:/www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authoritiesUk_Setting_a_minimumK^Zhttps://www.gov.uk/guidance/authority-proforma-tool-apt-information-for-local-authoritiesVu_Private_finance_initiativeJ. _Split_sites_1)+  _Lump_sum4 _Sparsity_Prior_attainmentu"_https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-funding-formula-for-schools-and-high-needs  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuwxyz{|}~Root Entry FUKData v1Table,WordDocument.SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjr  F Microsoft Word 97-2003 Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q